Updated: After ACLU Complaint, Father-Daughter Dances No More in Cranston
The music is over for father-daughter dances in Cranston.
Earlier in the school year, parents were notified that father-daughter and mother-son activities will no longer be held in Cranston Public Schools because school lawyers concluded the traditions violate state gender discrimination laws.
The action was triggered by a letter from the American Civil Liberties Union, said School Superintendent Judith Lundsten. The letter was written on behalf of a mother who said her daughter was unable to go to the father-daughter dance.
Federal laws under Title IX allow father-son and mother-daughter events but state law is more restrictive, Lundsten said.
"We're following the letter of the law," Lundsten, a mother of two grown sons, said. "We never thought it was harming anybody, nobody ever had any intentions of doing that nor did any parent organizations have any intentions of doing that."
Republican Sean Gately, who is running for the state House Dist. 26 seat, issued a heated press release earlier today lambasting the school district.
In the release, Gately said his opponent, School Committee Member Frank Lombardi and his "school committee was asleep at the switch."
"Where is the 'Proven Leadership' I keep hearing about," Gately fired. "After already losing $150,000 of taxpayer money on the banner controversy, they made no effort to protect another important tradition enjoyed by generations of parents and children in the Cranston school system."
The change in policy occurred without any public discussion and the School Committee did not vote for any change. Gately said the issue could easily be fixed by inserting language in the state law that mirrors federal Title IX policy.
But school officials say it's not so simple. School Committee Member Janice Ruggieri said in an interview that Cranston isn't the first district in Rhode Island to ban father-daughter dances. Lincoln set that precedent.
Ruggieri said the decision to ban the dances was to comply with state law, which she said is very clear. According to state law, discrimination on the basis of sex is prohibited in admissions, the classroom, curriculum, athletics, counseling "and any other school function and activities."
"It's not a matter of local policy," Ruggieri said. "It's a matter of state law."
The School Committee has no authority to change state law and that's why it was never discussed at a committee meeting.
"I've heard from both sides and I understand people view this as a tradition. It's a thing my kids went to," Ruggieri said. "But it's also the state law."
Parents across the district are upset.
On our Facebook page, they chimed in:
"I think it is sad. It is a lovely tradition," said Cristina Wilkinson Trainer, who said her husband has been fighting cancer for two years to be at his daughter's side at one of the dances "like he was for our older daughter."
"It's absolutely ridiculous. Another tradition taken away due to one loudmouth who just had to ruin it for everyone," said Lea Corona Parent.
"I am so disgusted by the city of Cranston and the school department," said Deanna Oster. "I think it is ridiculous that Cranston is once again getting rid of something for the few and punishing the many that enjoy this tradition. Some of the best memories I have with my dad is at these dances. My daughter has just a few years left in elementary school in Cranston and then it is adios Cranston."
Lundsten said if the law is changed, the district will follow suit "and make the appropriate changes."
The issue right now is a bit of a distraction for the district. Lundsten said every person who works in Cranston Public Schools has a lot on their plate.
"We'll move forward and do what we're supposed to do and that's follow the law," Lundsten said. "Hopefully the lawmakers listen to what the public has to say."
The mother of the child reportedly approached her child's school with her concern. School officials said they tried to find an option for the parent without eliminating the dance, but she wasn't happy with any of the suggestions. It was then that she contacted the ACLU.
Matthew Horsman
12:59 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
I have two daughters not yet in school. I was looking forward to these dances very much. It's sad that people have no awareness of community and put themselves first in any situation possible. We are seeing the effects of a generation that always received a trophy and didn't learn to lose with grace and diginity.
Bill Santagata
4:25 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Blame the school committee. They could easily have a family dance that everyone is invited to. Imagine if you are a young girl whose father died and you only live with your mother. I guess that little girl would not be welcome at the dance. Or imagine you are a little girl who loves sports. You wouldn't be allowed to attend the mother-son baseball game the Cranston School Committee wanted to allow only boys to go to.
kbbooks
8:23 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Bill, if you are a young girl whose father died and you only live with your mother you were always allowed to go to the dance with an adult male, i.e. Uncle etc. You were not excluded from the dance. As for a little girl attending the mother-son baseball game you are correct. It is a mother-son game NOT a mother-daughter game! Why is that concept so hard to accept! It is a special event meant for a some bonding time between mother-son. If people have a hard time with that organize a mother-daughter game!!
Bill Santagata
8:33 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
The point is that in barring female students from attending a school-sanctioned "mother-son baseball event" the school is breaking the law. If you want schools to be legally allowed to forbid certain students from going to certain official school events because of their sex, you have to change the law.
I don't know if it would be legal to have separate mother-son/mother-daughter baseball game events. It's possible, although you'd have to ask a lawyer. But why bother? Why can't mothers bond with their sons and their daughters at a baseball game together?
According to the news reports on this story, the little girl in question did not have a male relative to take to the dance and wanted to take a female (presumably her mother).
AL Wilkins
7:17 am on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
You are so correct! This is shameful that one person's complaint can ruin the fun for so many. Why didn't her Mom encourage her to ask a granddad or uncle or the dad of a friend? That's what happened back in our day. I for one am sick to death of the political correctness that has run amok in this Nation.
Jeff Berard
3:14 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Insert Manufactured Outrage Here:
After losing 150k to the ACLU in an ill advised and poorly conceived legal challenge to a request to remove a blatant article of Christian iconography at Cranston West HS, one could surmise that the Cranston School Committee has little appetite to pick another poorly conceived and ill advised legal skirmish with the ACLU over Father-Daughter dances.
I truly do empathize with my fellow Cranston residents who pine for the days of yester-year and the simplicity of tradition colored with the rose tint of memory; but society has moved past you. It's time to reconcile yourselves to the fact that the definition of family has changed and expanded to reflect the world we live in, not the world many of you remember.
In plain English; Father-Daughter or Mother-Son events can often be seen as exclusionary to those whose family units do not comport to such defined terms.
It would be another journey down a dark legal rabbit hole; an appeasement at best for a vocal and often obnoxious group of residents who refuse to accept that the world at large is not the same world in which they grew up.
I would prefer the School Committee find ways to return music, art, science, technology and sports programs to students who are desperately lacking exposure to real world skills and enrichment activities which are necessary to prepare them to compete, than wasting more money on further legal boondoggles.
Joe Richer
8:14 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Society did not just "move past", as you put it. Choices were made that have contributed to contribute to the breakdown of the nuclear family.
When I look around, I don't observe an improvement in the human condition brought about by those decisions. So, it may not be as advisable as you suggest to simply accept the destruction of the nuclear family as the basic building block of society.
No one is being excluded. Some may feel "something is wrong" when they cannot participate in exactly the same way as others (going to the event with an uncle or family friend) but are you certain that sense that something may be wrong is without value?
I am certain that children are better off with strong and wise male and female role models (regardless of orientation), so I am in favor of programs that encourage such relationships.
Is that so wrong?
Sharon Ihlefeld
10:03 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Jeff you're an idiot, I'm guessing you don't have kids. If you do, I feel sorry for them.
Dan P
1:54 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
I agree with Sharon....Jeff....you are a jerk. I hope you don't have kids. My daughter went to her Father/Daughter dance with me and it was wonderful. It's a time that neither of us will ever forget.
joe laux
4:24 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Poor Jeff , You have no sense of community for what others might enjoy. One person full of self, its all about me an attitude of selfishness encouraged by the ACLU and a thousand more good memories go down the drain for the children and their parents. Why do liberals have so much self loathing. It colors what they write and you can even see it on their faces.
Frank Abbat
5:55 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
and your thought process is exactly why this country is in the mess it is in.
Brian
9:10 am on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Jeff, it is a personal choice of those to live outside the traditional definition of family. They should accept the consequences of their choice. Society should not alter to an individuals whims. Laws and morals of a society are present for the best of the society as a whole, not as a pleasure of the individual.
Bill Santagata
4:44 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
It is not always a choice to live outside the "traditional" definition of family (e.g. death of a parent), and children especially have no choice in the construction of their families. It is not the government's place to judge people's family structures, nor is it really anybody's business.
Robin Lionheart
7:37 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012
Well said, Jeff. School administrators should've let students come with any adult, but at least they decided to stop illegally discriminating against one of their students. Pity some Cranston parents want to waste more taxpayer dollars fighting another law, apparently not learning anything from their failed fight for religious favoritism.
susanne evans
6:43 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Of all the news today this was shocking to me! My girls are grown now and have children themselves. However they still to this day talk fondly about their father-daughter dances. It was a great event to have that special time together and a few times their grand father would also join <2 daughters 1 dad> to buy that special dress and a special flower from Dad...I consider myself very liberal however I find it amazing people can bring gay "partners" to proms etc<I am not against it> but can not bring a parent to that special father/daughter or mother/son event. When will this madness end? As much as I like the ACLU this is very wrong!
Bill Santagata
4:28 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Schools can have father/daughter dances! They just have to allow mother/sons as well, along with ALL types of families (like a little girl whose father died and she only lives with her mother. The school would have to allow them come as a mother/daughter pair).
Sean P Gately
7:24 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
http://conta.cc/S0oAcc
TruthHonorValor
10:48 am on Monday, September 24, 2012
You apaerntly are a desperate man. It is sad that you cannot tell the truth and that you are willing to misrepresent the facts and situation, and lie about others for your own personal and political gain. I was going to vote for you, but I cannot vote for a man with no conscience who would distort the facts and mislead the public. Shame on you. Not much of a legacy to leave your children.
Sadie
7:44 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Although I find the Father/Daughter dances a bit ridiculous I think it it absolutely idiotic that these events are no longer happening because the ACLU once again has made an issue of something so minor. These dances are in no way exclusionary. A little girl can go with a relative, go along with a friend and her dad or ask a family friend. This has been happening for years.
When will this madness end?? Cranston, stand up and tell the ACLU to shove it!
James Rush
8:28 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
If we all did things or passed laws on one persons opinion or because one or two people feel excluded the courts would,and will be overrun with ignorant issues such as this how about finding a solution for all and stop apeasing the few but allow the majority to descide judges are not GOD who are they to take this family tradion away.
James Rush
Kathleen Crowley
8:30 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
I am so disgusted that people did not even have the right to vote on this. WE TEACH CHILDREN TO STAND UP AGAINST BULLIES AND YET THE CITY OF CRANSTON BACKED RIGHT DOWN!!! THESE DANCES ARE PAID FOR BY INDIVIDUAL FAMILIES YOU HAVE TO BUY A TICKET. SO HOW IS THIS AGAINST THE LAW. IT IS NOT PAID FOR BY TAX MONEY.
Bill Santagata
4:30 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
It is hosted and sanctioned by the school and is therefore subject to federal and state anti-discrimination statutes. Schools can host family dances, but they have to allow students of both sexes to attend. When schools host an event, it's an event for everybody. Not just the girls, not just the white kids. For everyone.
The School Committee did not need to cancel this event. Write a letter to your representative.
Donna C
5:40 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
not just the white kids????? Really, Bill???
Bill Santagata
6:11 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
The same anti-discrimination statutes that prohibit discrimination based on sex also prohibit discrimination based on race, religion, sexual orientation, among other things. Under these laws, it is not considered "more okay" to discriminate based on sex in comparison to discrimination based on race. A "girls only" dance is as equally illegal as a "whites only" dance.
Donna C
6:22 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
you are stretching, my friend. There was a mother/son dance. And there are other dances that all kids can attend. But, I will not waste my time, you obviously have all the answers and we should all just sit back and listen to you. What's the next tradition you want to kill? I wait with baited breath....
Bill Santagata
6:38 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Going by what the ACLU said...the other option was not a mother/son dance it was a mother/son baseball outing, so it was a different type of event. A little girl who loved baseball presumably would not have been allowed to go.
The next tradition I want to kill is the tradition of being unable to distinguish between good traditions and traditions that exclude and divide people. I also want to kill the tradition of not being able to look at traditions critically, the tradition of holding all traditions in nothing but the highest esteem, and the tradition of holding onto traditions no matter whom they may hurt.
Is the sight of seeing a daughter with no father attend a family dance with her mother such an abhorrent sight for people to see that they would rather forgo any and all "family dances" if they aren't allowed to exclude her from a father/daughter dance?
TruthHonorValor
10:32 am on Monday, September 24, 2012
@Bill.
The School Committee did not cancel the event. They did not write the law proclaiming the event illegal. They did not cave to the ACLU. They simply followed the law until such time as the law can be changed. Before you start blaming those who are not to blame, please take the time to learn how laws and govenment works, and the oath that elected officials take to uphold the laws of the land.
Contact your State rep to change the laws! The School Committee has no legislative authority!
Julie p
9:11 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
I didn't have a father growing up my grandfather took me to every single dance and now that he's gone I can look back on those pictures and remember how we had so much fun each year. It's sad and pathetic that one parent can ruin it for all the other children. That's what's wrong with our government
Donna C
12:15 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
right on Julie. It is sad and pathetic!
Robin Lionheart
7:08 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012
Julie, and what memories would you have taken away, had you been told you could not go to the dance, because your male relatives were not available to take you? Your big night would have been ruined by some petty bureaucrat. That's what's sad and pathetic.
BigMama
12:57 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012
I couldn't agree more, Julie P. I wonder how this young girl is going to EVER grow up normally if Mama is shield her from every uncomfortable situation. Our society is becoming too CRAZY when it comes to political correctness. Shame on that mother.
Rene 393
10:14 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Its not so much ending the life long tradition of Father Daughter dances but its about one more right we as US citizens have lost.
Yankee Clipper
10:20 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EV5XTwuBFQ
Grammy
10:59 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Again, Cranston makes the headlines! Why don't they just have a Students' Dance with both male and female students who would each have an adult accompany them?
Bonnie
11:19 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Why is this a problem. This event is for the child. Let them have fun with a mom, dad, uncle, aunt, friend, whoever they want. We have dad's take sons to the bowling day and mom's take daughters to the dance. Everyone has fun and the Children have a memory. Enjoy life it is too SHORT!
Donna C
12:13 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
WHEN are we going to stop catering to ONE person, while the WHOLE has to "suffer"??? One lady is ruining a tradition for all because her daughter can't go to a dance?? Really?? What are we becoming?? This child doesn't have an uncle, or family friend who could not take her to the dance?? Was going to the dance that important that we have to have the blasted ACLU involved and now all kids can't enjoy the dance?? This mother should be ashamed she has stopped the enjoyment for many other families. I am disgusted at what we've become....very sad.
kbbooks
8:28 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Well said.
Frank
1:31 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
The people of Cranston have to replace the entire school committee and replace the Mayor, he won't fight for anything, If this happen in Providence, I'am sure the Mayor would have something to say and a least fight for the people, Vote out the present Mayor and School Committee, and start over
TruthHonorValor
10:35 am on Monday, September 24, 2012
That's right Frank! Burn the witches! They are evil!
Really, Frank? You cannot be for real with such an uneducated and myopic comment.
Dan P
1:50 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
I live in CT and this bit of "news" made it here. I think it is totally absurd. Because 1 or 2 people complained they have to ruin it for every other family? What's the big deal? If there isn't a father in the picture, I'm sure there's an uncle or grandfather or even a cousin that could go. You people and your "politically correctness" make me want to puke.
Bob Havey
1:59 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
When I was a kid, one of our neighbors had two girls. Their dad had been a fighter pilot and was killed in the Korea War. My dad went to the father-daughter dance with each of them to stand in the gap for their dad.
THAT is how it works in America! The Cranston School Department and especially the crackpots at the ACLU should be ashamed. Sadly, they probably are NOT!
Donna C
2:11 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
what a nice thing of your father to do!!! That's great! Yes, that is how is should work in America!!!
Cranston Resident
5:03 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
You are right Bob. Those were the wholesome good old days when everyone got along happily and helped each other. Cranston has turned into a city full of angry selfish people.
kbbooks
8:43 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Bob, Yes that is how it works in our America but not sadly in Bill's vision of what America should be. So sad.
TruthHonorValor
10:44 am on Monday, September 24, 2012
Your father sounds like a good and decent man. America needs more of that.
However, the schoold department has to uphold the law, even if they don't agree with it. Are you advocating the sedicious posture that our govenment employees should act in open violation of the law?
It's the State Legislature who wrote the law and the ACLU that should be ashamed.
Mystique RS
2:29 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
It's stupid to take away such a tradition, but - that said - why not make a NEW tradition? "Family Dances". Father/Daughter, Mother/Son, Father/Son, AND Mother/Daughter...or even aunts/uncles/grandparents (or other legal guardians). The so-called traditional family of mom, dad and 2.4 kids doesn't really exist anymore. At least no one would be able to claim exclusion and whine about it anymore.
I feel sorry for the little girl, but was this a case of HER insistence or a case of her mother being OVER-protective?
There are plenty of single parents, and for our school system, if you have one parent, mother/daughter pairs are welcomed at father/daughter dances while father/son pairs are welcomed at mother/son dances. I'm thankful our schools here recognize that families comes in all forms.
Bill Santagata
4:04 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
A lot of ruckus over nothing. The Cranston School Committee could easily change it to a "Family Dance" and allow both fathers/daughters, mothers/sons, uncles/nieces, etc. Not all children live with their mothers and fathers, so in addition to eliminating the gender discrimination problem it also recognizes family diversity and doesn't leave children out.
There, problem solved.
Bob Havey
4:07 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
True, but the point is they shouldn't have to.
Bill Santagata
4:11 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Public schools can't host events that only one sex is allowed to go to. I have read the ACLU's response and apparently Cranston Public Schools also planned a mother-son baseball event parallel to the father-daughter dance. What if a girl likes baseball? What if a son doesn't live with his mother, but only his father? Why can't the girls be allowed to attend the baseball game with their mothers?
There is nothing wrong with hosting a family dance or a baseball game outing, but if a public school hosts an event it hosts an event for *everyone.* Not just the boys, not just the white kids. For everyone.
kbbooks
8:39 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Bill, Oh the horror!!!! A mother-son baseball game!! OMG what is this country coming to that we would allow mothers and sons to actually have an event together...What evil-doers thought of such weird and twisted outing?? Thank God, uh, nope sorry, thank you ACLU for being able to defend us from this morally reprehensible act.
Bill Santagata
8:49 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
I have absolutely no problem with mothers and sons attending a school-sponsored baseball game event. The problem is the school saying to a female student: Nope you are forbidden from attending this game with us because you have a vagina!
It is only this action that is illegal. The fact that you are foaming at the mouth to make it legal is truly horrific.
Doug Tarnopol
4:45 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012
As usual, Bill is absolutely right. I don't know why the PTO/School Committee/both couldn't have just said, everyone's invited. To both dance and ball game. Nowhere did the ACLU say that they wouldn't accept that. So, why in the world did the board (or the admin) cancel the thing? If it was over logistics, why not say so? If the PTO wanted to have the dance, and all the people who are upset over its cancellation really wanted their kids not to be disappointed, then the obvious thing to have done would have been to open it up to everyone. Period. Anyone know why that didn't happen?
Cranston Resident
4:59 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
I must be getting old....
I grew up in a Cranston full of traditional families that went to work, went to church services every week to worship their God, and where fathers and daughters enjoyed that special date together at the school father and daughter dance. I have wonderful memories of this.
Now the city has been overrun by angry, gay, atheist, divorcees that want everyone else to be like them and who are invading the wholesome traditions we once new.
The city has now deteriorated to a place full of unhappy, angry, selfish people.
Bill Santagata
5:04 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Nothing is degrading...it's just that white, heterosexual Christians are no longer being granted special exemptions from laws and must live alongside people who are different from them. For some people this is too much to ask, apparently.
Cranston Resident
5:25 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
It is degrading the quality of life that future father's and daughters will be deprived the fond memories of those special evenings they spent together.
You and your type are depriving entire future generations of traditions that made Cranston such a wholesome place to raise a family. You can argue the legalities but I still lament the loss of traditional values the make up the fabric of our community.
While the laws you cite protect a minority, the erosion of these traditions is not improving the moral and cultural quality of life for most people who want the traditional family unit and religious cultures preserved.
Just look around you. Our society is deteriorating and it is largely due to your laws.
Bill Santagata
5:29 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Somewhere a little boy or girl in Cranston wanted to attend one of these events but was forbidden to do so. It seems like you would rather kick that student to the ground in the name of upholding some esoteric notion of "tradition" rather than simply hosting an event that all students are welcome to, an option that the PTO can certainly do.
In addition to the fact that some boys may want to go to the dance and other girls might want to go to baseball game, the fact remains that not all boys have mothers and not all girls have fathers. Maybe a parent died, maybe a parent was abusive, maybe a child lives with grandparents, etc. This is all entirely beyond the child's control yet you would punish them for it.
The only deterioration in society I see is the lack of compassion for people in different situations.
Cranston Resident
6:46 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
I mean really...."kick that student to the ground"????? Really, you should be ashamed of yourself. We are talking about a father and daughter going to a dance!!
The real deteriorization of our society come from the Bill Santagatas philosophy of victimization and entitlement. It is your element that really makes anyone who may be different feel victimized. In my day we tried to make a little girl who didn't have a father happy by pitching in and bringing her with us. Your type of people would rather put them in the spotlight and make them feel victimized, thus assuring a lasting injury to their self esteem.
Donna C
6:52 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
people like Bill are never ashamed of themselves. It is his attitude and outlook that is destroying this country. I am exhausted with all of this. First the banner, now a dance...taking the innocent things we get enjoyment out of and throwing them out so it fits their mantra. I guess I am too old fashioned, and quite frankly, people like Bill are what's wrong in this country today. They will not be satisfied until all good is gone, and we are all as miserable as they are.
Bill Santagata
6:54 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
According to what I saw on the news, a little girl wanted to attend the dance but did not have a father or father figure in her life, so was not allowed to attend (presumably because she wanted to bring a female, most likely her mother). I don't know why she didn't have a father or father-figure, and it's not really any of my business (and especially not the government's business). What you presumably want is to not allow her to go.
If it's not going to be a father/daughter dance then it can just as easily be called something that more accurately reflects what it is. The ACLU did not cancel this dance. The mother did not cancel this dance. The child did not cancel this dance. Ultimately, it was the PTO who canceled this dance. If they allow the daughter and mother to go then they are perfectly allowed to have the dance.
Bill Santagata
7:03 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Despite the media hyping this story up by linking it to the prayer banner case, this issue has nothing to do with the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. It has to do with state anti-discrimination statutes.
I have nothing against family dances, with fathers taking their daughters to dance. This dance would be perfectly legal if the school allowed a girl who had no father or a male figure she felt comfortable with to take her mother to the dance. Why would you be against this?
Ultimately, it doesn't make a difference what I or anyone else thinks. I am usually against "political correctness:" a Christmas tree is a Christmas tree, a war memorial with a cross honoring specific Christian fallen soldiers does not need to be moved. But when it comes to what is *legal* and *illegal*: the law is the law and must be followed. We can change the law if we like, but until this happens no one can just declare themselves "exempt" from laws they do not like.
Janice Ruggieri
5:06 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Just to clarify : The policy states that schools should not be having any gender specific events but only hold events that are open to the family and students of both genders ( family events). The issue is only for gender specific events.
Cranston Resident
5:24 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Then it is a bad policy.
Cranston holds gender specific events for baseball, football, tennis, basketball, etc.
So change the policy, not the events.
Bill Santagata
5:25 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Hopefully the PTO (or whoever is responsible) has simply changed the father/daughter dance to a family dance and the mother-son baseball game to a family baseball game and that can be the end of this manufactured outrage.
Bill Santagata
5:28 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Cranston Resident: Sports are a different story and fall under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (federal law). Public schools can have gendered sports, but they must have a team for each gender. If there is a boys' tennis team, there has to be a girls' tennis team. In the event that there isn't two teams, then both boys and girls must be allowed to participate on the one team (e.g. Cranston West has only one football team, so they would have to allow girls to try out for it as well.)
Janice Ruggieri
5:34 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
I did not write the law and I may not agree with the law, but as an elected official and a citizen it is my duty to adhere to Federal and State Law.
Cranston Resident
6:47 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Then if you do not agree, do your job and Change It!
Robin Lionheart
7:32 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012
Janice, if only your fellow school board members had heeded your arguments in the banner debacle. Thank you for consistently trying to keep the school from breaking the law.
Sean P Gately
6:16 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Janice as an elected official it is also your duty to recognize that there is problem that will affect every student and child in the district and to be proactive about it. This would of never been an issue if the School Committee members as private citizens who knew about this issue last May decided to explore the proper remedy by requesting the GA to insert the proper language in the existing law. This school committee instead decided to do nothing until today. Although I am encouraged that the committee is now following my lead and you will be sending a companion request that I have already sent to the GA leadership to fix this once and for all.
Steven r
7:15 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
I will still vote against all of them, they still cost Cranston $150,000 for that silly prayer banner last year.
Cranstonparent
7:22 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Steven r, Janice knew the banner was illegal and voted to take it down.
Robin Lionheart
3:29 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012
The four committee members who cost Cranston $150,000 were Frank Lombardi, Michael Traficante, Andrea Ianazzi, and Paula MacFarland. They’re the ones you should vote out, not Janice.
Mike G
7:24 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
I seem to remember a movie from the 80's called Footloose or something. When the town cancelled a dance they moved the dance to a nearby building and didn't let the malcontents attend. hmmm
Pete Delvecchio
8:09 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
I am writing a letter to the ACLU and see if I can have weddings banned as "sexist". I am going to have to face a huge bill when my duaghter gets married and I am offended that society has made her become a princess for the day. Who's with me, guys? Maybe we can get the ACLU to stop weddings and then we can all take the money saved and buy new fishing boats!
Bill Santagata
8:17 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
A wedding ceremony is a private event and is not sponsored by the government. You can therefore admit or exclude whomever you wish. Your daughter can dress as she likes at her own wedding, as a princess or a pirate if she likes. What would be unconstitutional would be for the *government* to say that she *must* dress like a princess.
I am getting the impression that people think that the ACLU makes up its own laws...the anti-discrimination statutes in question were passed as laws by the Rhode Island General Assembly.
Donna C
8:21 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Bill...give it a rest already. ACLU was founded by communists....chew on that!
I'm with ya Pete!!! We should ban alot of things that could offensive to some poor innocent victims of society!!!
Bill Santagata
8:27 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
The ACLU was not actually founded by Communists (and even if it did, guilt by association is not a valid argument). In the 1930s, they gained notoriety for defending the free speech rights of Communists. As much as I may disagree with Communism, people have the constitutional right to advocate for communist positions if they want.
Donna C
8:37 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
The ACLU was indeed founded by communists. Maybe you should read instead of bloviating on this website!!!
Bill Santagata
8:45 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Donna, you can read more about the founder of the ACLU here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Nash_Baldwin
Mr. Baldwin was interested in communist philosophy for a brief period of time, but then quickly turned against it as he saw the horrors of the Stalin regime. He led the purge of communists from the ACLU membership in the 1940s.
Again, this doesn't change the fact that the ACLU doesn't make up the laws. The General Assembly passed the law in question. They have the power to modify it if they wish.
Robin Lionheart
7:47 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012
Pete, I don't think the ACLU would be interested in your anti-wedding crusade, but if you were to sue the state to allow same-sex weddings too, they'd be in your corner.
Cranston Resident
8:22 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Yes Pete and now you have me thinking. I always wanted to play for the Red Sox.
But they have gone ahead and have made it so that only the chosen few extremely talent people could do that .
I feel discriminated against too!
Let's ban Baseball!
Bill Santagata
8:28 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
State law prohibits discrimination by school events on the basis of sex. There is no law prohibiting discrimination on the basis of lack of ability or talent.
Donna C
8:30 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
well, then in that case we'll need to ban football...
Bill Santagata
8:34 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Under Title IX (federal law), public schools *must* allow girls to try out for the football team (or any sports team) if there aren't separate boys and girls teams. The same goes for boys and the cheerleading squad.
Cranston Resident
9:36 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
well then lets get the ACLU to make it a law
Cranston Resident
9:44 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
But Major League Baseball is made up of privately owned "Clubs".
An yet not one of these "clubs" have a female player.
That discriminates against all women.... Hey!!!! Let's get NOW and ACLU both workin on this one....
Bill Santagata
4:42 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
The key difference is *privately owned clubs* not government-run schools. Again, the ACLU doesn't write the laws. They just help people who report violations of the law to them.
Cranston Resident
8:25 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Or better yet let's rename Major League Baseball to "Everybodyball" so that everyone can play!
Donna C
8:29 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
good idea. We don't want offend the minor league..
Pete Delvecchio
9:07 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Bill, I I was only joking about the wedding. I was hoping everyone saw that I was being completely absurd. I was not, however, joking about getting a new fishing boat. One should never joke about that!
keith
10:04 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Only one comment the mother of this little girl left out one fact her daughter did attend the dance
Cranston resident
10:12 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
What kind of children are we raising when they never learn how to deal with disappointment? The world is not fair. Life is not fair. We don't always get what we want in life. These are lessons learned at a young age that help mold the type of adult you will become. It seems like today, some parents will go to any length to spare their child from any disappointment in life. Do you think 50 years ago there were not children who could not go to these events? Of course there were but they learned to deal with it and knew it was not the end of the world. They saved thier energy for things that really mattered.
Robin Lionheart
7:41 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012
Are you raising your children not to stand up against injustice? Not to fight for fairness? Maybe some of us want our kids molded into better adults than you have become.
Leslie Lee
8:20 am on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
I can't believe how nit-picky the ACLU and this asinine "law" is. Don't they have bigger fish to fry??? Turning a Mother-Son or a Father-Daughter event into gender discrimination is so sad. These events at school are about FAMILY. A MOTHER doing something with her SON and a FATHER doing something with his DAUGHTER. Why are we turning that into something wrong??? When this ridiculous state law "prohibits school events on the basis of sex", I think it meant more like you can't have an "Only-Girls Sewing Club". Or you can't have a "Manly Man's Lumberjack Group". (I'm purposely being stereotypical here.) Getting involved in the family events are ridiculous! And everyone knows if a child does not have one of these figures in their lives, they have the opportunity to bring someone else close to them to these events. It would be one thing if this mom who's causing all this hoopla had a son who wanted to attend the father-daughter dance and the school wouldn't allow it, but its about a single mom who's daughter supposedly had an issue with the father-daughter dance, called the ACLU and now they turned it into this "gender-biased" issue.
Children are growing up so fast these days. I teach in an elementary school and the girls look forward to this event like you wouldn't believe. Can't we just let these kids enjoy their childhood and these innocent and fun traditions that we've enjoyed growing up without this absurd "law" or ACLU interfering in our lives???
Bill Santagata
4:41 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
I think the best option is to change state law so it does what the federal Title IX does: it has an exception for father-daughter/mother-son events. However, if the school has a father-daughter event, they must hold a comparable mother-son event. They couldn't do a father-daughter dance but then have a mother-son baseball game (as Cranston did here). They would have to have a father/daughter dance and a mother/son dance (or a father/daughter baseball game and mother/son baseball game). I don't want schools sending the message to young girls that "girls shouldn't like sports" or something similar.
Jackie T.
5:19 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
I understand that Bill S. is (rightfully) supporting nondiscrimination based on gender in that that you must have "comparable" events to ensure inclusion. What I have a problem with is one voice determining that her child was not treated fairly and so the rules have to be changed for everyone.
There was a wonderful graduation speech given this past year by a teacher that said "You are not special" -- and it spoke volumes to me about how our children feel a sense of entitlement.
My son played grade school soccer through a local parks league -- everyone got a trophy and no one ever "lost" a game. But I can guarantee that every boy and girl knew who the best players were and the final score of every game. We need to make sure our children try to the best of their abilities, learn to graciously acknowledge victories, and just as graciously learn how to accept losses. Somehow we have evolved into a society that won't allow our children to lose.
You cannot have everything and you are not entitled to everything.
Robin Lionheart
7:30 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012
No, Jackie, the rules don't have to be changed for everyone; your school has just stopped breaking the rules that already existed.
Sheri Nevill
11:22 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012
It seems to me that there are two choices here: ban all of these activities or be more inclusive when you still have them. The activity isn't ruined because someone wants a mom or son at a dance or a daughter or dad at a baseball game. If your family wants to make it a special outing for the father and daughter, then go for it. Nothing is saying you can't just send father and daughter, but now little girls who are growing up without dads (like mine whose father died 5 and a half months ago) can enjoy the evening too. We don't have any other male relatives living near by, either. Seriously, which is worse: a mother attending a dance that was traditionally for fathers and daughters, or a girl having to stay home from a dance because her father is dead and there are no other men to take her?
Terry
12:40 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012
I feel sorry for the girl in this story. I wonder how her peers will treat her now? This girl will be known in her community as "the one we had to give up our tradition for". I wonder how she feels now? This girls mother just made her daughters life-- a living hell. I bet she won't live in the community when she grows up. I wouldn't want to stay. Who wants to live under that black cloud? As a mother, I would have found a trusted male, perhaps her favorite male teacher, to accompany her to the dance. If none were available, I would have planned a "special" night out for us. A night for her daughter to look back on and say "wow mom, thanks".. If we want to have our traditional dance with father/daughter, mother/son.. we should be allowed to do so. If we want to have a gay rights parade, we should be allowed to do so. If someone wants to attend church services and pray, do so, If we want prayer in our schools we should be allowed to do so. For those who don't want to pray in school- you don't have to. Why can't we live with the motto of "to each his own"? What a wonderful world this would be if we could all learn to respect each other's beliefs-- then we could live" happily ever after". It would be a "win, win" :)
Robin Lionheart
3:15 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012
I feel sorry for how she was mistreated before, when petty, small-minded people told a fatherless girl she couldn’t bring mom to the dance instead. Why couldn’t they live with the motto “to each her own”? What a wonderful world it would be if they all students were respected alike and included in student events — then we could _all_ live “happily ever after”, instead of “majority wins, minorites lose”.
But no, because they excluded her instead, it got out that they were breaking discrimination laws. And apparently this was a school that’d rather stop having dances than accomodate a single orphan.
Bill Santagata
4:24 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012
It is already "to each his own." Students can, for example, pray in schools all they like (provided they are not disrupting education). But it is not to the *government's* own. Our government is one of limited powers and what government-run schools are allowed to endorse is subject to legal limitations.
In this case, you would not need to amend the United States Constitution. You would only need to amend a state anti-discrimination law that does not carve out the same exceptions as its corresponding federal law (Title IX). Title IX grants exemptions for father-daughter, mother-son events, however if the school hosts a father-daughter event, they must host a *comparable* mother-son event.
What I don't want to see is the PTO planning lots of "girl" activities and "boy activities," essentially telling young girls that they shouldn't be into sports, so we're doing a boys-only baseball game outing parallel to a girls-only dance recital, or vice versa (for example).
I am also averse to labeling things father-daughter, mother-son even if students are allowed to take someone other than a father or mother. This isn't a legal concern, so yes it does fall in the realm of "political correctness" but I think we should respectfully take into consideration the feelings of children from different types of families instead of simply brushing them aside.
Sheri Nevill
4:25 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012
The issue is one of exclusion. Straight people can go to gay pride parades. Anyone can go to church if they want. They were not stopped from having a dance...they CHOSE to cancel it instead of letting a fatherless girl attend with her mother. Letting that girl attend with her mom wouldn't have stopped anyone else from going as father-daughter pairs. It wouldn't have changed the memories they would have been able to make. Can you imagine looking back in 20 years saying "My father-daughter dance was completely ruined because there was a mother there!" ??? The ACLU did NOT cancel this dance. The dance was perfectly acceptable. All they said was that this fatherless girl should be allowed to attend with her mom. Blame the school for cancelling the tradition, not the ACLU or this girl and her mother.
Susan English
4:10 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012
I'm glad I don't live in Cranston. For a lot of reasons but if the people commenting on this demonstrate the mentality of the majority I would hate to live among you.
Doug Tarnopol
4:54 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012
You know, you people would be wise to really listen to Bill. He's a product of the Cranston school system, by the way, and I hope he won't mind me noting that he's quite young! He's entirely impressive, and more important, he's right. Bang on right.
I find it funny that people who I presume are against the Nanny State and all for law-and-order are whining over the fact that the Nanny State has rightly pulled its backing of this illegal activity. The fix was and is entirely obvious, and doesn't require rewriting the law, despite what Candidate Gately says. If you changed RI law to perfectly match the Title IX statute, you'd still have to have a "comparable" event. So changing the RI law will get you precisely nowhere, as Gately may actually know.
You guys are being led by the nose by a candidate manufacturing fake outrage in order to get elected. Perhaps you should direct your ire in that direction rather than at Bill, the kid involved, his mother, the ACLU, or any other scapegoat. Or perhaps also at the PTO. All of this smells like a political stunt to me -- you know, stirring up the pot to cause trouble -- what you people hate the ACLU for supposedly doing.
Janice Ruggieri
5:22 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012
Mr. Tarnopol...in response to your question in your prior comment...that is exactly what the Superintendent said in her letter. It states: " These events must be open to the family and students of both genders" It goes on to state : " Please be all-inclusive when planning your events". This fact was left out in the posts that people sent out and was also left out of most media reports.
Doug Tarnopol
5:59 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012
Hey, Janice:
First, you can call me Doug if you like. :) Second, I just read a copy of that letter and it was letter-perfect, so to speak. My real questions are: why was the dance cancelled and who cancelled it? That part I don't quite get. Lundsten didn't ask for a cancellation. The ACLU didn't, either; I read their letter. I might be missing something here, but I don't see it.
If it was concern over suits if it went forward, despite the ACLU's position, then why not just make it totally inclusive right away? Logistical problems, like seats available in the room, fire codes and so on? I could see that.
If you (or anyone) knows the answers to those questions, I'd appreciate it, because they could go right to the heart of the issue.
If it's the case that whoever was running this dance chose to cancel it out of petulance (not due to logistical issues) rather than conform to the law, then *that person* (or *those people*) are the ones who need to explain themselves to the crying girls noted above -- and I don't mean that snottily. I'm sure many are quite disappointed. If it was simply a matter of logistics, well, that ought to be made public. It'd be understandable.
Many thanks,
Dug
Janice Ruggieri
6:26 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012
Doug, the dance was not cancelled. The dance that this issue stemmed from happened last year and the child attended. This policy of all-inclusive events is for this year. PTO's are planning their events under this new policy for this year.
Cranstonparent
7:28 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012
Janice, Thank you for always chiming in with a clear explanation. You are the only member of the school committee that tries to explain and clarify the issues.
Fatima A Finamore
6:11 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012
I lived in Cranston for 16 years and loved it. I moved out in 2004. I Must tell you how disappointing it is to see the city has lost it's backbone. Cranston used to be the first large city in RI to defend what was best for the city at large, it's citizens & stand for what it is right. What happened? there seem to be no juice left in anyone to stand up for what it is right or for tradition. My daughter went to private school but I do not recall any issues with any of the parents. I was a single Mom; more reasons why I do not understand the position of this particular single mom, the ACLU or the school depart. decision to cancel it. My daughter asked me why couldn't I go when I told her she could invite any of her uncles or her father. Why not? We had a great time. The next year she went with her dad. That photo of so long ago is prescious. There are tons of reasons why fathers are sometimes not in a girls life but here are the things to consider; 1-not all girls have just a Mom, 2-not all girls want to be Tomboys, 3-Not all girls want to be included/excluded (the dance can go on and not everyone needs to go), 4-it is another opportunity for every young girl to socialise (maybe for the first time) with their peers regardless of religion, socio-economic, race or nationality. Maybe a girl becomes a teacher, a doctor, a lawyer etc because her "new" friend's father is one them. America, we, must stand up to ALL the things made this country great. I for one have had enough!
Bill Santagata
6:47 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012
The law is the law and it must be followed. No one is above the law. No one is allowed to pick and choose what laws they feel like following. The ACLU does not write the laws. "Having a backbone" means nothing if the law is not on your side. All it means is attracting a hefty lawsuit that the city would lose.
The law can change however, which means you have to do work on your part to get changed. Write to your representatives in the RI General Assembly. They have the power to change this law. Until this happens however, everyone will be expected to follow the law.
Doug Tarnopol
7:11 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012
Oh, OK, Janice, that makes sense.
So, obviously, all the PTA (PTO?) has to do is sponsor a family dance this year, and all will be well. Why little girls all over Cranston are crying and being told there are no more dances is a bit odd, don't you think?
It'll be very interesting to see how this dance thing goes this year.
Bob
7:23 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012
ACLU...SCUM BAG LOSERS...PLAIN ENGLISH.....
natalie
9:03 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012
What's next?
This article makes me feel old, When my girl had father daughter dance, she loved it. I still have the 6 yrs. of traditional father daughter dance pictures. I do also remember that girls who did not have their dads, another person was allowed to go, no big deal. This is ridiculous!!!!!!!
Doug Tarnopol
9:22 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012
Ummm...as far as I can tell, there will be a dance this year. Either a family dance or both a daddy-daughter dance and a mother-son dance. So, why, exactly, is everyone going crazy over the non-cancellation? I'd be interested in any reply.
Bill Santagata
9:26 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012
It's because the media is being deliberately sensational. Even I was sucked into it. I thought that there was an upcoming dance that was suddenly canceled due to a parent complaint with help from the ACLU. The dance in question seemed to have happened several months ago (or last year?), was called a "Ladies' choice" dance, and the General Assembly can at any time modify the law to allow ladies' choice dances to continue to go on as scheduled.
Doug Tarnopol
9:24 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012
I also want to second Cranstonparent on Janice's engagement. On both this issue and the banner issue, she has been very helpful in answering questions online, and I'm sure in person, too.
Doug Tarnopol
11:41 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012
Word, Bill. As everyone can see above, I, too was sucked into it. Sigh.
PJ Brennan
12:49 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012
If I was a parent in Cranston who wanted the Father/daugther, mother/son dance tradition to continue, I'd just sponsor it privately. Collect donations, find a venue, and plan for the event to take place as it was had.
PJ Brennan
12:51 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012
I will admit, if the girl attended the dance, and as was stated above by another single-mother, she was allowed to attend with her daughter, I don't understand the purpose of the complaint. What was the problem? Why did she feel the need to destroy this tradition for the rest?
Noyes Parent
4:41 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012
My children don't have a father (two-mom family) and I take no offense with daddy/daughter, mommy/son events. I do however assume that my daughters would be allowed to attend with a male stand-in (friend, relative, etc.) I think any event that allows parents to interact in an 'out of the everyday' way with their kids is great.
Fatima A Finamore
10:44 am on Monday, October 1, 2012
This is in response to Bill Santagaba; Bill I am with you that we all have to abide by the law. How come you said nothing when President Obama decided to pass on the system and make illegals immigrants (undocumented still illegals) when to me it seems very illegal? why nothing much was said?? I am a foreign born Naturalized Citizens (took the test although I did not speak English but worked really hard to pass it and my grandmother had to be in her 70"s when she took the test) and have always being a law abiding Citizen, saw my family go to great pains, financially and otherwise, to make sure we entered here legally. I would have agreed to an easier path to legalization to the individuals singled out by the president but to me it seems the law does not always apply to all equally and that is my problem. I would have liked to see the UCLA taking on something that big and not attack the few things that makes us bettter as people. UCLA are doing what when we are going to be hit with a mandatory healthcare whether you can afford it or not? This is the kind od war they should be taking on but that would be unpolitical. So, they attack values, compromise our freedom but as long as they do it to the people and not to the large politcal empire. Shame on this organization. I have yet to see them fight something worth fighting for unlike father-daughter dance or a school banner 50 years old!
Robin Lionheart
3:21 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012
Fatima, So, which civil liberties of undocumented immigrants have been violated there, which the ACLU should be defending?
Bill Santagata
4:07 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012
How can you assume what my stance is on the Obama illegal alien minors decision? Immigration law gives the President discretion to determine who is or is not a high priority to deport. The President can't with a wave of his hand grant them a green card to make them legal citizens (which Obama did not do here) but he can hold off on deporting them at his discretion.
The *ACLU*'s philosophy is that once a complaint is lodged with them, they will strike back at *any* illegal breach of civil liberties by the government, no matter how small or insignificant they may seem to others. It doesn't make a difference how much people love father-daughter dances. They are illegal. Period the end. Change the law if you want public schools to have them (which I would support). It doesn't make a difference how old a prayer banner is, it is an illegal endorsement by the government of religion. Amend the Constitution to make Christianity the official government religion of the country.
Fatima A Finamore
9:44 am on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Bill, clearly you write well, so well you look right at first glance. The president has open the Highway to some reported 80,000.00 young illegals to begin the process and to me that equals the same just an around way of doing the same thing. You stated "The President can't with a wave of his hand grant them a green card to make them legal citizens", but in essence it is what ultimately will happen. I am foreign born and want fairness what I DO NOT want is for those that "cut the line" (regardless) sort of speak, be awarded a free pass. No exception. What message are we sending young people today?? that you have rights without merits? why work at doing the right thing? more reasons to enter illegally when we feed them, feed them, educate them and give free medical treatments while we say the hell with those here that spend years being legal and thousands upon thousands of dollars to do so. The hell with Americans and other legal citizens from other nationalities doing the right thing to be legal and are starving and struggling to survive. I am not as articulate as you are and people like you that can turn words that sound correct are dangerous to our society. Rhode Island,.. please weight in as I would love to hear what the majority of you are thinking!!
As far the ACLU,...
Bill Santagata
3:54 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
You're turning this into a debate on illegal immigration which is way off topic. Legally, there is a difference in using presidential discretion to refrain from deporting an illegal immigrant and granting him a green card (turning him into a legal immigrant). The illegal immigrants who were brought here as children have not become legal immigrants or U.S. citizens, it is just that for the time being they will not be deported. Congress could pass a law if it wanted to stripping the President of his discretion regarding deportations.
Fatima A Finamore
9:47 am on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
President Obama (President Osama as I refer to him) must GO, some of out politicians that say the correct words but do absolutely nothing to improve this state or are for ever impoverishing our beautiful state must also GO. I left RI from 2004 to 2009 and I am ashamed to see how bad the state of RI has been converted in such few years. Everyone and everyone in a job, an office or position that could make things better but does not must GO!!! Wake up Rhode Island. Do you want to wake up January to the Tsunami of the Obama care nightmare and think "I could have done something" The time to affirm to all we will not tolerate government abuse IS NOW and NOT when it will be too late!!!
Fatima A Finamore
9:51 am on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
As far as the daughter dance I say the time has come to make some drastic changes. The ACLU must start looking at the big picture or they too must GO. When I think of the organization I feel they take these instances (school banner, daughter-father dance)are chosen to keep themselves in our mind. They realize these are popular situations to pick to remind us of their power but ultimately we have the power if and when we choose to use it!
Bill Santagata
3:56 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
No one has any authority to make the ACLU "go." We have the constitutional right to peaceably assemble. The ACLU is not doing anything illegal in providing legal services to those wronged by infringement of civil liberties.
Doug Tarnopol
9:59 am on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Fatima, I used Google to translate your last comment into German. I think it fits better:
<<Präsident Obama (Präsident Osama, wie ich auf ihn beziehen) muss gehen, einige von Politikern, die richtigen Worte zu sagen, aber absolut nichts tun, um diesen Zustand zu verbessern oder sind für immer ärmer unserer schönen Staat muss auch gehen. Ich verließ RI von 2004 bis 2009 und ich schäme mich zu sehen, wie schlecht der Zustand der RI in solchen Jahren umgewandelt worden. Jeder und alle in einem Job, hat ein Büro oder Position, die Dinge besser zu machen, konnte aber nicht muss gehen! Wake up Rhode Island. Wollen Sie aufwachen Januar nach dem Tsunami des Obama Pflege Alptraum und denke, die Zeit, um zu behaupten, "ich könnte etwas getan haben" alles, was wir nicht tolerieren wird die Regierung Missbrauch ist jetzt und nicht, wenn es zu spät sein wird!>>
Fatima A Finamore
11:56 am on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
I wish I knew German!!
Fatima A Finamore
12:04 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Doug here it is in Spanish (I am Spanish)
El presidente Obama (Presidente Osama como me refiero a él) tiene que ir, algunos de los políticos señala que dicen las palabras correctas, pero no hacen absolutamente nada para mejorar este estado o para siempre empobreciendo nuestro hermoso estado también debe ir. Salí de RI 2004 a 2009 y me da vergüenza ver lo mal que el estado de Rhode Island se ha convertido en tan pocos años. Todos y cada uno en un puesto de trabajo, cargo o posición que pueda hacer las cosas mejor, pero no tiene que ir! Despierta Rhode Island. ¿Quieres despertar enero al Tsunami de la pesadilla cuidado Obama y pensar "yo podría haber hecho algo" El tiempo de afirmar que todo lo que no tolerará los abusos del gobierno es ahora y no cuando sea demasiado tarde!
Fatima A Finamore
6:32 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Here are two interesting articles:
http://www.infowars.com/obama-to-legalize-illegal-immigration-by-decree-will-add-800000-voters-in-November/
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/10-things-that-will-happen-if-barack-obama-continues-to-systematically-legalize-illegal-immigration
Bill Santagata
9:07 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
The first article is merely a summary of Obama's executive order with a misleading headline that it will add 800,000 voters. Again, Obama does not have the power to make these illegal aliens citizens, and only citizens may vote.
While some of those things mentioned in the second article *might* happen, it doesn't make the President's policy *illegal.* Just because a policy might be bad or have negative consequences doesn't mean that it is illegal to enact.
Fatima A Finamore
3:23 pm on Wednesday, October 3, 2012
It will not only add 800,000 BUT SO MUCH MORE!! It was and is a gesture to further gain Spanish voters, period. Clearly you are an Obama advocate regardless of what he does you are in it. I am in for what is right and that was wrong, wrong and wrong!!!
Peter A. Filippi III
9:23 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012
School Committee Member Robert LaFazia (Dist. 1) explained during a phone interview this morning that about 12 years ago, he and other parents at Thornton Elementary School started holding dances for families, rather than specifying father-daughter or mother-son.
"We combined it and made it a family dance, and we offered it as a chance to have a family photo taken — because who goes out anymore and has a family photo taken?" LaFazia recalled. "We've been doing it ever since, and I'm glad we changed it years ago — we never had any complaints, the parents are happy, and all of the events have been great."
Peter A. Filippi III
9:24 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012
I can only imagine how many parents would take their children out of these liberal conforming ridiculous institutions if they had the chance which vouchers would provide them which would also save $millions annually for every community. I had it with these devious people who have gotten themselves into every critical area of our society for the express purpose of bringing our country down morally and financially… Mr. Brown most little girls would be honored to go to a Father- Daughter Dance just as most little boys would be honored to dance with their Mom’s in which most I’m sure would take their own pictures. If I’m elected mayor I’ll be the nightmare of nightmares for these liberals and unions. I say let’s go back to our roots… As for school committee member LaFazia, who were those parents who would have so little commonsense or regard for traditional values? In my opinion public education is public enemy #1, Republican Mayoral Candidate
Jen Gottlieb
1:20 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
My 11 year old daughter has been crying for two weeks about a father daughter dance she could not go to. What she is really upset about is the fact her dad abandoned her and moved on to another "replacement" family and daughter. Her coping method is to try not to think about it, although it greatly depresses her. Why should the school set this poor kid who never deserved to be treated like trash to feel bad again? If fathers want to accompany daughters to a regular dance, they can. Why does the dance itself have to be exclusionary, such that I can't take her if I am the only parent that cares for her (mom who doesn't like to see my daughter cry anymore)
Jen Gottlieb
2:38 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
To Peter Philippi III: My little girl who was left flat by her father is not a "liberal" and is not "immoral" it was her dad who was immoral and abandoned her. Why should she have to constantly be reminded of that and made again and again to feel bad about herself? I was also not a "liberal" and "immoral" about my marriage as I was totally devoted to her dad. It was her dad (again) that abandoned the family to run off with a 23 year old girl. It is not her dad who is crying about the dance..it is the girl left behind..who did nothing wrong. So you think being sensitive to a little girl like that is "immoral"? You are the one who is immoral for failing to have compassion.