patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

On Eve of Charter School Vote, Cranston Officials are Unified in Opposition

Nine General Assembly Representatives — including four from Cranston — are urging the Board of Regents for Elementary and Secondary Education to reject the charter school application of Achievement First for a mayoral academy in Providence.

 

With the Board of Regents for Elementary and Secondary Education poised to vote tomorrow on a proposed mayoral academy charter school in Providence, Cranston school officials are keeping their fingers crossed the plan is shot down.

Along with most of the Cranston School Committee's membership calling for the proposal to be denied, nine State House representatives of communities that would be served by the school are urging the Regents to reject the application.

In a Jan. 18 letter to Board of Regents Charmian George D. Caruolo, the representatives said that Warwick, Cranston and North Providence should be excluded from any mayoral academy charter because their respective school districts are meeting education standards and the academy would siphon money away from public schools at the worst possible time.

“Given the Assembly’s recent legislation that moves the state into a Fair Funding Formula, it seems ironic that this Mayoral Academy appears at the state’s doorstep now,” the legislators wrote. “Funding a Mayoral Academy based on per pupil expenditure will adversely affect the participating communicates in terms of budgetary holes that the Fair Funding Formula was designed to alleviate.”

The Cranston legislators signing the letter were Rep. Charlene M. Lima (D-Dist. 14), Rep. Peter G. Palumbo (D-Dist. 16) Rep. Arthur B. Handy (D-Dist. 18) and Rep. Robert B. Jacquard (D-Dist. 17).

The proposed charter school operator is Achievement First, which operates charter schools in Connecticut and New York and submitted a failed request to build a charter school in Cranston last year. That proposal met stiff opposition from the Cranston community despite its backing by Cranston Mayor Allan W. Fung.

The legislators argue that the mayoral academy would be funded by the public school districts at a cost of about $15,000 per student. Each student that goes to the charter school would result in a hit to the public school budget.

"The per-pupil expenditure is calculated by dividing a district’s entire budget by the number of students, but since the high cost of educating special-needs students is factored into that number and those students would be less likely to attend the mayoral academy, the districts would be disproportionately affected financially," a General Assembly release stated.

The charter school plan is not without its supporters. Along with Providence Mayor Angel Taveras, some members of the Providence City Council and School Committee support the plan along with the Superintendent. The proposal has also been endorsed by the Rhode Island Foundation, Rhode Island Kids Count and Rhode Island Mayoral Academies.

Also backing the plan is state Education Commissioner Deborah Gist.

Update: An earlier version of this story incorrectly suggested that a majority of Providence School Committee and City Council members supported the proposal.

Related Topics: Achievement First, Charter School, Cranston School District, and Mayoral Academy

Providence Taxpayer

3:35 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012

The Providence City Council is not "mostly in support" of this proposal!!! 7 council members publicly oppose the proposal, and only 3 support it. If it went to a vote today the proposal would be shot down, President Solomon won't allow it to go to vote cause he knows he doesn't have the votes for it to win.

As for the Providence School Committee, it's appointed by the Mayor, as is the Superintendent who is hoping her status as "interim superintendent" will soon become permanent!

This proposal is very upsetting to many Providence residents from all sides of the city and across all races, in spite of how Achievement First's lobbyists – RI-CAN, DFER, RIMA & Bill Fischer – would have you believe.

Reply

Suzanne Arena

10:08 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012

http://www.copaa.org/general/charter-schools-and-students-with-disabilities-preliminary-analysis-of-the-legal-issues-and-concerns/

This disturbing report is just out and for me it says it all (excerpt): "In the wake of “National School Choice Week,” COPAA is pleased to release the brief Charter Schools and Students with Disabilities: Preliminary Analysis of the Legal Issues and Concerns written by the Center for Law and Education under contract with COPAA. The stated purpose of National School Choice Week is to “shine a spotlight on effective education options for every child.” Charter schools have long been touted as one of the most promising educational choice options, yet the research remains limited, inconsistent, and for the most part, inconclusive as to whether charter school students are actually more effectively learning and performing than students of similar backgrounds enrolled in traditional public schools. Disturbingly, data shows that students with disabilities (especially low incidence, more significant disabilities) are denied meaningful access to and a free appropriate public education within charter schools."
I commend the Cranston Delegates for taking a stand and denouncing this to be a $$$$ wise choice.

Reply

Chris12

9:11 am on Thursday, February 2, 2012

What I don't understand on this charter school issue is a lottery is used for registration and many kids are turned away because there is not enough room. Not being in the education system I don't understand the popularity of the charter school (needing a lottery) as opposed to the political side that says it's not good for the community. Can someone explain this oddity?

Reply

Leave a comment