patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Sexting By Minors Officially Illegal In Rhode Island

Governor Chafee signed a bill into law on Tuesday that would create a status offense for minors that send sexually explicit photos of themselves, but the ACLU says the bill missed the mark.

 

Governor Lincoln Chafee signed legislation on Tuesday that makes “sexting” by minors illegal in Rhode Island.

Minors who create and transmit sexually explicit images of themselves on their computers or cellphones can now be charged in Family Court with a “status” offense and, like the old law, other children or adults who possess or forward the “sexts” can be prosecuted under the state’s child pornography laws. Status offenses are age-related acts that would not be punishable if the offender were an adult, such as truancy.

“In today’s world, many people choose to communicate via the internet and cell phones,” said Attorney General Peter F. Kilmartin in a press release, “However, without proper guidance, these types of communication technologies can be dangerous to a child’s physical and psychological well-being.”

The bill was a win for supporters of the legislation who claimed child pornography laws were too strict to punish minors for taking nude photos of themselves. But the law still makes it possible to prosecute minors who distribute sexts they receive to be punished under the strict laws.

Steven Brown, director of the Rhode Island American Civil Liberties Union, said that was his primary concern with the bill.

“We’re concerned about criminalizing this activity, which admittedly is not something kids ought to do, but it is widespread,” Brown said. “But the bill as it was ultimately passed does not prevent the possibility of kids being charged with child pornography.”

“All it has done is added an arsenal of weapons to police rather than provide protections to kids,” added Brown, “This bill unintentionally codifies the principle that kids could be charged with child pornography for engaging in this activity.”

He said his office attempted to add language to the bill that would prevent kids from being charged with child pornography for sexting, but that the attorney general’s office rejected that idea.

“It’s shocking that the state would even want to consider, or that any police department would even want to consider charging a minor for child pornography for this activity,” said Brown, “It’s something that parents should worry about their kids doing, but the idea that they could be charged with a felony and face lifetime registration as a sex offender is absolutely outrageous and unconscionable, but that’s what they wanted to do.”

At Wednesday’s School Committee meeting, School Committee Members Stephanie Culhane and Janice Ruggieri shied away from the merits of the legislation, but discussed the topic of sexting.

“We aren’t educating our kids properly for them to understand the ramifications of sending things out into the universe via electronic media,” said Ruggieri, “Because they don’t understand that when they put something into a text, or on Facebook or in an e-mail that it’s out there and it can be retrieved any time and that people are looking at it." 

She said that currently the school system brings in speakers to talk about cyber bullying, as well as other issues, and that maybe sexting should also be a topic.

“I think also that we as parents are not educating ourselves about the social media that goes beyond what we’re comfortable with or what we know,” said Culhane, “We’re being very naïve to think that our children won’t [sext].”

Both Culhane and Ruggieri agreed that it is up to parents to keep a close eye on what their children are doing on the internet and their cellphones.

“If they’re kids and we’re paying their bills, we have the right to look at things and review things,” Culhane said, “As a parent I feel that we have a right to infringe on their privacy.”

Related Topics: Sexting and child porn

Jack Jones

6:14 pm on Friday, July 15, 2011

Sexting can be "dangerous to a child’s physical and psychological well-being".

So can adverts for alcohol and tobacco, eating junk food, and bullying, not to mention getting prosecuting for sexting.

Reply

Stanley Sinnick

6:29 pm on Friday, July 15, 2011

Let's get this straight. We prosecute the child for a crime that might (or might not) subsequently be committed by someone else against them? Or we prosecute the child because they might regret having sent the image in the first place... as if kids don't get upset enough by their consequences.

Presumably if the kids get psychologically damaged by being prosecuted, we can sue the lawmakers who instigated the laws that caused our kids harm?

Reply

Joe Richer

7:25 am on Monday, July 18, 2011

It seems to me that the consequences for this act are built into the act itself. Government cannot replace parenting. Just take a look around you and you will see the folly in believing that it can.

Reply

Foxeyroxie15

3:44 pm on Saturday, August 6, 2011

A bit off topic but, with the economy the way it is, how can parents afford to pay for cell phones for their kids? I truly don't understand why they need them anyway. I had one several yrs. ago - it wasn't worth the expense so I got rid of it.
I didn't communicate with my kids that way - they picked up a friend's phone to let me know what was going on or we had face to face communication. Even in high school, I received my daily phone calls at work for check in.
We also sat and ate dinner every night, discussed the day's events. Were my kids perfect? No, but I had a handle on what was going on. It wasn't always smooth sailing but that's part of parenting.
Kids aren't always going to volunteer info. Sometimes you have to ask - you might or not, get a straight answer. They had their privacy, too.
I'm just happy that I don't have kids today.

Reply

Jack

1:36 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011

Let me get this straight!! it is legal for two teens to get nude and have sex together, yet it is now illegal for one teen to send the other teen a nude picture of them self or ask each other to have sex? I can understand it if a adult asked for sex or took pics of a teen, but not a teen to a teen. I can also understand a teen taking a nude picture of another one and posting it on Facebook or another site, or sending it to a friend. As a former Rhode Islander i can say with certainty that the state has gone over the limits of common sense. Your now going to make children sex offenders who will be ruined before they reach adulthood. The Gov has lost touch with reality. Kids have been having sex since the beginning of time. Leave it to the political leaders who have cause our country to go broke to now make it a communistic country as well.

Reply

Jack

1:48 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011

Both Culhane and Ruggieri agreed that it is up to parents to keep a close eye on what their children are doing on the internet and their cellphones.<------------ if that is the case then why are you morons meddling into there affairs? What two faced people your are. And to think that the kids don;t know anything about the electronics world is just plain wrong, They know more about it than you people do, and they know if they post a nude pic of them selves everyone will see it, Did it ever occur to you that that is exactly what they want. regardless of those facts, this bill should be over turned, it is ridiculous at best to start making children sex offenders. To top it off to you so called educated morons, how many schools hand out Trojans so they protect them selves whiles having sex? Kind of an Oxymoron if you ask me, But even if you don't ask, your all losers. DO something constructive like HELP the kids.

Reply

Leave a comment