Fellela introduces bill to increase gambling age to 21

STATE HOUSE -- Rep. Deborah A. Fellela (D – Dist. 43, Johnston) has introduced legislation that would increase the legal age for gambling to 21 years of age.

STATE HOUSE – Fearing that 18-year-olds are not ripe to deal with the potential consequences of gambling, Rep. Deborah A. Fellela (D – Dist. 43, Johnston) has introduced legislation that would increase the legal age for gambling to 21 years of age at any facility where there is a pari-mutuel betting system, casinos or slot parlors.

The House bill (2013-H 5032) provides penalties for gambling underage, including fines and loss of one’s driver’s license.

“We allow our adults to handle alcohol at a minimum age of 21 years old because it comes with a lot of responsibility and potentially severe consequences when abused,” Representative Fellela said. “Gambling comes with hefty consequences as well. A 21-year-old theoretically is enrolled in an institute of higher education, is a member of the military, holds a job or has at least had a few years of real world experience. I think it’s reasonable for the General Assembly to look at raising the legal age at a time when Rhode Island has agreed to allow Twin River casino to expand.”

Under this piece of legislation, an individual convicted of underage gambling would be guilty of a disorderly persons offense and shall be fined between $100 and $500. That person’s driver’s license would also be suspended for six months. If the convicted individual is under the age of 17 and has not obtained a driver’s license, the issuance of his or her license shall be postponed for six months.

Parents or individuals with custody of an underage gambler can face the same penalties if they are convicted of allowing an underage person to gamble.

Cosponsors of the House bill include Representatives Stephen R. Ucci (D – Dist. 42, Johnston, Cranston), Samuel A. Azzinaro (D – Dist. 37, Westerly), Mary Messier (D – Dist. 62, Pawtucket) and Patricia A. Serpa (D – Dist. 27, West Warwick, Coventry, Warwick).

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Joe Richer January 19, 2013 at 04:17 PM
So 18 year olds are competent enough to go into harm's way on our behalf, vote for our leaders, marry, and raise children but somehow not mature enough to drink beer or play the lottery? I am not arguing that all 18-year-olds are responsibe intellectuals that are completely prepared for life. What I am arguing is that we need ONE age that represent that point in life in which you are fully vested with your rights and responsibilities. What we don't need are elites micro-managing the lives of our citizens.
Robert "Bobby" Giarusso January 20, 2013 at 09:11 PM
This woman has it all wrong. She uses the consumption of alcohol as an example of why gambling should be restricted to persons 21 and over. Instead of increasing the gambling age, we should be lowering the age to drink. Residents in Ms. Fellela's district along with those in the co-sponsors districts should be upset that they're more concerned with preventing adults from gambling than fixing our state's economy.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »