.

Cities Seek Right to Suspend COLAs

The mayors of Cranston and Providence asked the Legislature to amend the pension reform to prevent bankrupting municipalities.

When considering whether to move to a city or town, potential residents most often look at the quality of the school system as the key determinant. An educated buyer, according to state Auditor General Ernest Almonte, will add another criteria: the unfunded liability.

While the state is certainly facing a pension crisis that threatens to derail its economy, cities and towns are looking at an even worse problem, Almonte told the joint House and Senate Finance Committees as hearings on the pension reform proposed by Gov. Lincoln Chafee and General Treasurer Gina Raimondo continued Tuesday.

Municipal employees and retirees who are not part of the state Municipal Employee Retirement System face an even larger unfunded liability than those who are part of the state system. For example, in Cranston, the unfunded portion of the pension totals more than $500,000 per employee, he said.

(Read about Johnston Mayor Joseph Polisena's take on the state pension proposal.)

The state pension reform proposal includes a portion to deal with failing municipal pensions. The legislation would require cities and towns to go back to the bargaining table with unions to find a way to fund the pensions. They would have to achieve 80 percent funding or 50 percent improvement over their current funding level within the next 10 years. Most municipalities are funded below 60 percent, according to Richard Licht, director of the state Department of Administration. The state deems 20 plans to be at-risk and estimates $2.1 billion in non-MERS pensions alone is unfunded.

"It's not the employees' fault. It's the municipalities that haven't funded the system," Licht said. "All we want to do is find a pathway to a solution. How can anyone say there isn't a legitmiate public purpose in securing the pension system."

That pathway would require municipalities to come up with a plan to fund their pension systems and present it to the state Solvency Review Board, according to Marybeth Gallogly, director of the state Department of Revenue. Failing to do so would result in the loss of state aid and the suspension of Cost Of Living Adjustments for retirees.

"I have a deep concern that local pension funds are not secure at all," Gallogly said. "It is our obligation to act so this doesn't happen again."

While most municipalities agree, some feel the state-mandated reform doesn't go far enough. Cranston Mayor Allan Fung and Providence Mayor Angel Taveres urged the Legislature to amend the package so it goes further, suspending COLAs for municipalities from the start. Without suspending the automatic annual raises for retirees, he said, Cranston would need to come up with an additional $95 million in new revenue over the next 10 years just to reach the funding mandates the legislation lays out.

"It would force dramatic increases for my taxpayers in Cranston," Fung told the committee. "We can't keep going back to them to pay for these legacy promises. I need your help in recognizing the dire straits Cranston and other municipalities are in. There is an urgency upon all of us to reform."

Suspending the COLA would be a big help to the city, Fung said. Eliminating it for 10 years would immediately eliminate $50 million from the city's unfunded liability, he said. A 15-year suspension would knock $60 million off the liability, he said. The pension reform bill calls for a 19-year suspension of COLAs for state retirees, but does not address those outside the state pension system.

Providence is in even worse shape, Taveres said. Over 10 years under the pension reform plan, the capital city would would be on the hook for an additional $170 million, he said. Taveres proposed amending the legislation to suspend COLAs for up to 19 years, require municipal pensions to be no more generous than the state system requires, and move more employees into the state system.

"We want an opportunity, like the state, to suspend the COLAs on critical plans," Taveres said. "By passing an amended bill, we can start the process of fixing our city."

Police and fire unions have voiced their opposition to the reform plan, focusing much of their criticism on any suspension of the COLA. Paul Reed, speaking on behalf of the state firefighters union, called the plan "an attack on collective bargaining," though he said the unions would be willing to return to the negotiating table to seek a solution.

Treasurer Raimondo is expected to address the joint committee today, after the public testimony portion, which is expected to last into the evening.

give me a break November 02, 2011 at 08:54 AM
i agree cities should b allowed to suspend colas for aleast 20yrs and raise the co-pays 25%
Govstench November 02, 2011 at 12:06 PM
Let's take this one step further - the unions should have no say in the pension benefits. Decisions on pension plans should reside with the municipality - no contributions by the employee into the plan so there is no input required by the employee. Also, buying credits into these plans should be banned. This has been clearly abused over the years. The best way is to get rid of these plans all together and send the contributions to a 401K plan
Thuglife November 02, 2011 at 12:20 PM
Hey, Govstench, who created the plan? State Legislators did, not the average working stiff. There is a problem, and that is the many years the money that was supposed to go into these plans was diverted to other uses. The market was doing great so the funds were used for other things. It's mismanagement and poor planning that is the problem, not union greed.
Greg November 02, 2011 at 03:00 PM
We've submitted a plan to save Cranston $400,000-$600,000 on their electricty costs. I'll bet that would help. www.firstpointpower.com/gpage
I'm Tired of the Games November 02, 2011 at 08:57 PM
Polisena is right about adding the municipal pensions to the reform bill. That section should be removed and let these pension plans be dealt with by the municipalities who created the mess. Licht hit the nail on the head, it isn't the employees, it's the municipalities who have failed to live up to their promises. Almonte told Narragansett years ago that it had a problem (administrators didn't make the required payments) and the Town Council voted in 2006 to put $1 Million back into the pension. Town Manager Ceasrine, Finance Director Krugman chose to ignore this and didn't do it. One current Council member Wilkens voted for the increase and has sat on his hands since. The current council only funded 63% necessary in FY2010 (Auditor General Hoyle 5/11) and is tagged as one of 4 plans going in the wrong direction. So, the municipal fix forced by Chafee will not work and will hurt municipalites.
RS November 08, 2011 at 05:09 PM
What do you mean no contributions by employees????? The employees have been contributing their required amount every week. The municipalities have been the ones stealing the money and spending it instead of investing it. Maybe you also didn't know that the employees have no say on how the money is invested...is that fair?
RS November 08, 2011 at 05:10 PM
Do a bit of Digging...Polisena collects a nice municiple pension as well as a salary for being Mayor, plus he gets free health care for life.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something